Share Favorite
Fort Worth
Ranked 17110th safest out of 31k cities
* The total includes cities, towns, villages and CDPs.
Disaster Risk
More Details Crime Risk
More Details Disaster Risks
Disaster Risk is high for Fort Worth. The most significant environmental threat for this location is Flood, with a high risk score of 58.
Hide detailsFlood Risk
58% High risk
There’s a High Flood Risk score for Fort Worth, where the FEMA floodzone is X. This area is not flooded by the 100-year flood event but it is at risk from the 500-year flood event. Insurance is NOT MANDATORY.
Methodology
The Augurisk Coastal Flooding Hazard index is based on three key components: the mean elevation of your block, the expected sea level rise in your area, and your exposure to hurricanes.Note that storm surge is currently not explicitly described by the Augurisk coastal flooding hazard index. Depending on your location, storm surge can increase the water level by considerable amounts.During Hurricane Katrina, the sea level increased by up to 28 feet locally (NOAA). If you live along the coastline, it is strongly advised to follow official announcements in your area.
References
Elevation data - USGS 3DEP Elevation . Sweet, W.V., R.E. Kopp, C. P. Weaver, J. Obeysekera, R. M. Horton, E.R. Thieler and C. Zervas (2017), Global and Regional Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the United States. NOAA Tech. Rep. NOS CO-OPS 83. For more information on storm surges, visit nhc.noaa.gov
The Augurisk Coastal Flooding Hazard index is based on three key components: the mean elevation of your block, the expected sea level rise in your area, and your exposure to hurricanes.Note that storm surge is currently not explicitly described by the Augurisk coastal flooding hazard index. Depending on your location, storm surge can increase the water level by considerable amounts.During Hurricane Katrina, the sea level increased by up to 28 feet locally (NOAA). If you live along the coastline, it is strongly advised to follow official announcements in your area.
References
Elevation data - USGS 3DEP Elevation . Sweet, W.V., R.E. Kopp, C. P. Weaver, J. Obeysekera, R. M. Horton, E.R. Thieler and C. Zervas (2017), Global and Regional Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the United States. NOAA Tech. Rep. NOS CO-OPS 83. For more information on storm surges, visit nhc.noaa.gov
More details
Wildfire Risk
23% Low risk
Fort Worth faces a Low Wildfire Risk.
Methodology
The Augurisk Wildfire Hazard index is defined at the U.S. Census block level. It is based on the potential for wildfire burning in your block - based on data from Dillon et al. (2015, 2018) - and the impact of climate change on the potential for wildfire in the United States, particularly in the West (Abatzoglu and Williams, 2016). Therefore, the average temperature change in summer between the 1980-2005 and 2006-2100 has been extracted from two selected Regional Climate Models (RCMs) from the NA-CORDEX project (Mearns et al.,2017) and taken into account in defining the hazard score. The scenario considered is RCP4.5. All index values are normalized to a 0-100 scale..
References
Abatzoglou, J.T., and A.P. Williams. 2016. “Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(42):11770. Mearns, L.O., et al., 2017: The NA-CORDEX dataset, version 1.0. NCAR Climate Data Gateway, Boulder CO, accessed [December 2019], https://doi.org/10.5065/D6SJ1JCH Dillon, G.K.; J. Menakis; and F. Fay. 2015. Wildland Fire Potential: A Tool for Assessing Wildfire Risk and Fuels Management Needs. pp 60-76 In Keane, R. E.; Jolly, M.; Parsons, R.; and Riley, K. Proceedings of the large wildland fires conference; May 19-23, 2014; Missoula, MT. Proc. RMRS-P-73. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 345 p. Note : data updated in 2018.
The Augurisk Wildfire Hazard index is defined at the U.S. Census block level. It is based on the potential for wildfire burning in your block - based on data from Dillon et al. (2015, 2018) - and the impact of climate change on the potential for wildfire in the United States, particularly in the West (Abatzoglu and Williams, 2016). Therefore, the average temperature change in summer between the 1980-2005 and 2006-2100 has been extracted from two selected Regional Climate Models (RCMs) from the NA-CORDEX project (Mearns et al.,2017) and taken into account in defining the hazard score. The scenario considered is RCP4.5. All index values are normalized to a 0-100 scale..
References
Abatzoglou, J.T., and A.P. Williams. 2016. “Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(42):11770. Mearns, L.O., et al., 2017: The NA-CORDEX dataset, version 1.0. NCAR Climate Data Gateway, Boulder CO, accessed [December 2019], https://doi.org/10.5065/D6SJ1JCH Dillon, G.K.; J. Menakis; and F. Fay. 2015. Wildland Fire Potential: A Tool for Assessing Wildfire Risk and Fuels Management Needs. pp 60-76 In Keane, R. E.; Jolly, M.; Parsons, R.; and Riley, K. Proceedings of the large wildland fires conference; May 19-23, 2014; Missoula, MT. Proc. RMRS-P-73. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 345 p. Note : data updated in 2018.
Earthquake Risk
14% Very low risk
Such an earthquake is light. It is felt indoors by many, outdoors by few during the day. At night, some awaken. Dishes, windows, doors are disturbed; walls make cracking sounds. A sensation like a heavy truck is striking the building can be felt. Standing motor cars rock noticeably.
Methodology
The Augurisk Earthquake Hazard index is defined at the U.S. Census block level. It is based on the intensity of the earthquake happening in your block with a 2% probability over the next 50 years, and computed using data from USGS (Rukstales and Petersen, 2019). Intensity is defined based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale (MMI). All scores are normalized to a 0-100 scale.
References
Rukstales, K.S., and Petersen, M.D., 2019, Data Release for 2018 Update of the U.S. National Seismic Hazard Model: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9WT5OVB. More information on the Modified Mercalli Index and its interpretation can be found on usgs.gov.
The Augurisk Earthquake Hazard index is defined at the U.S. Census block level. It is based on the intensity of the earthquake happening in your block with a 2% probability over the next 50 years, and computed using data from USGS (Rukstales and Petersen, 2019). Intensity is defined based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale (MMI). All scores are normalized to a 0-100 scale.
References
Rukstales, K.S., and Petersen, M.D., 2019, Data Release for 2018 Update of the U.S. National Seismic Hazard Model: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9WT5OVB. More information on the Modified Mercalli Index and its interpretation can be found on usgs.gov.
More details
Fort Worth Disaster Risk Rankings
Crime Risk
Crime risk is low for Fort Worth. On average, 787 violent crimes 11945 property crimes, 2642 acts of vandalism and 1313 motor vehicle thefts occurred in average each year from 2017 to 2021 in your block group.
Hide detailsProperty Crime
20% Low risk
11945 observed Property Crimes in a year
Vehicle Theft
18% Low risk
2642 observed Vehicle Thefts in a year
Violent Crime
6% Very low risk
787 observed Violent Crimes in a year
Acts of Vandalism
19% Low risk
2642 observed Acts of Vandalism in a year
Methodology
The Augurisk Crime score is defined at the Census Block Group, by taking into account yearly violent and property crimes rates per 1000 inhabitants, predicted by our machine learning algorithm between 2015 and 2019. In order to predict crime occurrences where data is unavailable, our algorithm uses over 200 socio-economic, demographic, climatic, spatial, and law enforcement predictors selected based on various insights, from multidisciplinary literature review to correlation analysis and feature engineering. The predicting model is based on and has been tested against historical high-resolution crime data collected by the Open Crime Database for around 15 cities in the US with up to 79% accuracy.
References
Ashby, M.P.J. (2019): Studying Crime and Place with the Crime Open Database. Research Data Journal for the Humanities and Social Sciences 4(1), pp. 65-80. U.S. Census Bureau: American Community Survey, 2015-2019 5-Year Estimates. Fick. S.E., and R.J. Hijmans, 2017. WorldClim 2: new 1km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 37(12): 4302-4315. Our algorithm has been published in an academic journal: Predicting Spatial Crime Occurrences through an Efficient Ensemble-Learning Model.
The Augurisk Crime score is defined at the Census Block Group, by taking into account yearly violent and property crimes rates per 1000 inhabitants, predicted by our machine learning algorithm between 2015 and 2019. In order to predict crime occurrences where data is unavailable, our algorithm uses over 200 socio-economic, demographic, climatic, spatial, and law enforcement predictors selected based on various insights, from multidisciplinary literature review to correlation analysis and feature engineering. The predicting model is based on and has been tested against historical high-resolution crime data collected by the Open Crime Database for around 15 cities in the US with up to 79% accuracy.
References
Ashby, M.P.J. (2019): Studying Crime and Place with the Crime Open Database. Research Data Journal for the Humanities and Social Sciences 4(1), pp. 65-80. U.S. Census Bureau: American Community Survey, 2015-2019 5-Year Estimates. Fick. S.E., and R.J. Hijmans, 2017. WorldClim 2: new 1km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 37(12): 4302-4315. Our algorithm has been published in an academic journal: Predicting Spatial Crime Occurrences through an Efficient Ensemble-Learning Model.
Fort Worth Crime Risk Rankings
Societal Risks
Societal risk is moderate for Fort Worth. The most significant societal threat for this property is Healthcare Infrastructure, with a moderate risk score of 46.
Hide detailsAir Pollution Hazard
43% Moderate risk
The Air Pollution Hazard Score is moderate (43.47) for the closest AQI monitor (Fort Worth CA Parkway N C1053), located 8.15 miles away from Fort Worth.
The maximum recorded AQI over the last 3 years is Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups (109). The maximum recorded AQI over the last 3 years is Unhealthy (193.72). In such circumstances, everyone may begin to experience adverse health effects, and members of sensitive groups may experience more serious effects.
Methodology
The Augurisk Air Pollution hazard score is defined at the U.S. block level. It is based on the daily median and maximal air quality values recorded at the nearest U.S. EPA AQI monitor over the last 3 years. All values are normalized to a 0-100 scale. To avoid disturbances in the distribution of risk scores, specific transformations to the higher percentiles of selected variables (i.e. winsorization) were applied to the maximal recorded AQI variable.
References
AQI data was collected from the U.S. EPA AirNow program. Map data is provided by Air Now Current Monitor Data Public on ESRI. More information on the U.S. AQI computation and interpretation can be found on the AirNow website.
The Augurisk Air Pollution hazard score is defined at the U.S. block level. It is based on the daily median and maximal air quality values recorded at the nearest U.S. EPA AQI monitor over the last 3 years. All values are normalized to a 0-100 scale. To avoid disturbances in the distribution of risk scores, specific transformations to the higher percentiles of selected variables (i.e. winsorization) were applied to the maximal recorded AQI variable.
References
AQI data was collected from the U.S. EPA AirNow program. Map data is provided by Air Now Current Monitor Data Public on ESRI. More information on the U.S. AQI computation and interpretation can be found on the AirNow website.
More details
Socioeconomic Risk
37% Moderate risk
The Socioeconomic risk score for Fort Worth is moderate. In 2018, your county had a $65k Median Household Income and a 3.5% unemployment rate, as compared to the $51.2k and 4.13% national averages. Besides, its average educational attainment, poverty rate and income inequality levels were higher than respectively 56%, 16% and 24% of all U.S. counties.
Methodology
The Augurisk socioeconomic risk index is based on multiple indicators, the two most important being the median household income and the unemployment rate. Additional factors include the mean educational attainment, poverty rate and income inequality in various proportions based on their respective correlations and sensitivity analysis. All values are normalized to a 0-100 scale.
The socioeconomic vulnerability index shown on the map is a distinct index, created by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and based on 15 social factors. More information on the CDC SVI can be found in Flanagan et al. (2018).
References
Flanagan, B.E., E.J. Hallisey, E. Adams, and Lavery A. 2018. “Measuring Community Vulnerability to Natural and Anthropogenic Hazards: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Social Vulnerability Index.” Journal of Environmental Health 80(10):34–37. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service: county-level datasets. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. County Health Rankings & Roadmaps 2019. countyhealthrankings.org.
The Augurisk socioeconomic risk index is based on multiple indicators, the two most important being the median household income and the unemployment rate. Additional factors include the mean educational attainment, poverty rate and income inequality in various proportions based on their respective correlations and sensitivity analysis. All values are normalized to a 0-100 scale.
The socioeconomic vulnerability index shown on the map is a distinct index, created by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and based on 15 social factors. More information on the CDC SVI can be found in Flanagan et al. (2018).
References
Flanagan, B.E., E.J. Hallisey, E. Adams, and Lavery A. 2018. “Measuring Community Vulnerability to Natural and Anthropogenic Hazards: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Social Vulnerability Index.” Journal of Environmental Health 80(10):34–37. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service: county-level datasets. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. County Health Rankings & Roadmaps 2019. countyhealthrankings.org.
Healthcare Infrastructure
46% Moderate risk
The nearest primary acute care or critical access hospital is located 3.13 miles away. The county hosts 1 hospital per 81.8K inhabitants, as opposed to the 1 per 66.9K national average.
Methodology
The Augurisk Healthcare Infrastructure risk index is based on multiple risk components, including the number of health practitioners in your county, the distance to the nearest primary acute care or critical access hospital in the HIFLD Hospitals Database, and the size of the nearest hospital as expressed by its number of beds. All values are normalized to a 0-100 scale.
References
Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data: Hospitals at this link. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. County Health Rankings & Roadmaps 2019. www.countyhealthrankings.org.
The Augurisk Healthcare Infrastructure risk index is based on multiple risk components, including the number of health practitioners in your county, the distance to the nearest primary acute care or critical access hospital in the HIFLD Hospitals Database, and the size of the nearest hospital as expressed by its number of beds. All values are normalized to a 0-100 scale.
References
Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data: Hospitals at this link. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. County Health Rankings & Roadmaps 2019. www.countyhealthrankings.org.
Fort Worth Societal Risk Rankings
Neighborhoods in Fort Worth
Alamo Heights Alexandra Meadows Altemesa East Arcadia Park Arlington Heights Bal Harbour Basswood Park Basswood Village Beechwood Creek Bellaire Park North Bently Village Berkeley Place Bluebonnet Hills Bluebonnet Place Bomber Heights Bonnie Brae Brentmoor Brentwood-Oak Hills Briercliff Brittany Place Brookside Bunch-Ellington Burchill Burton Hill Trinity Trails Butler Byers McCart Candle Ridge West Candleridge Carter Park Carter Riverside Carver Heights Carver Heights East Caville Central Chapel Creek Central Meadowbrook Chadwick Farms Chapel Creek Chapin & Alemeda Cheyenne Ridge Chisholm Ridge Cobblestone Colonial Hills Como Cookes Meadow Coventry Coventry Hills Crawford Farms Crestline Area Crestwood Deer Creek North Diamond Hill - Jarvis Dorado Ranch Eagle Ranch East Lake Worth Eastern Hills Eastland Eastwood Pleasant Glade
Echo Heights El Poly Pyramid Emory Place FW Vista West Fairhaven Fairmount Fairway Bend Falcon Ridge Far East Far Greater Northside Far Southwest Fossil Hill Estates Fossil Park Foster Park Fox Run Frisco Heights Garden Acres Gardens of Westridge Glencrest Glenwood Triangle Greenfield Acres Greenway Hallmark-Camelot Hamlet Hampton Place Handley Harbour Points Harmony Harriet Creek Ranch Harvest Ridge Heights of Park Vista Heritage Heritage Glen Highland Hills Highlands Hillside Morningside Historic Southside Hollow Hills Hubbard Heights Hulen Bend Estates Hulen Heights Jenkins Heights - Crest Ridge Jennings - May St. Louis John T White Kingsridge Lake Country Lake Crest Lake of River Trails Lakeland Lakeview Lakewood Addition Linwood Lost Creek Marine Creek Marine Creek Hills Marine Creek Ranch
Marine Park McPherson Ranch Meadow Creek Meadows West Meadows of Candleridge Mira Vista Mistletoe Heights Mitchell Boulevard Monticello Morningside Morningside Park Near East Side North Beverly Hills North Greenbriar North Hi Mount North Lake Worth North Side Northbrook Oakhurst Oakridge Terrace Overton Park Overton South Overton West Overton Woods Panther Heights Park Glen Park Hill Park Palisades Park Place Parkview Hills Parkwood Hills Paschal Poynter Crossing Quail Ridge Quail Run Ramey Place Remington Point Ridglea Ridglea Country Club Ridglea Hills Ridglea North Ridgmar River Trails Riverbend Rock Island - Samuels Rolling Meadows Rosemont Ryan Place Ryanwood Sandybrook Santa Fe Enclave Scenic Bluff Scenic Shores Sendera Ranch Sendera Ranch Sendera Ranch
Shaw Clarke Silver Ridge South Edgewood South Hemphill Heights South Hills South Lake Worth South Meadows Crossing South Poly Southgate Southland Terrace Sterling Creek Stone Creek Ranch Stone Meadow Stop Six Stop Six Sunrise Edition Summer Creek Summerfields Sunset Heights South Sunset Hills Sunset Terrace Sylvan Heights West Tanglewood Tejas Trails Terrace Landing The Crossing of Fossil Creek The Landing The Parks of Deer Creek The Ranches The Trails of Fossil Creek The Trails of Marine Creek The Vineyards at Heritage Trace Ridge United Riverside University Place University West Upper West Side Village Creek Villages of Stonegate Villages of Woodland Springs Vista Meadows Vista Ridge Waterview at Enchanted Bay Wedgwood West Byers West Meadowbrook West Morningside Westcliff Westcliff West Western Hills North Westland Westpoint Westridge Area White Lake Hills Willow Creek Woodhaven Worth Heights
Although the information found on this system and the Site has been produced and processed from sources believed to be reliable, no warranty, express or implied, is made regarding accuracy, adequacy, completeness, legality, reliability or usefulness of any information or predictions provided.